Go to CAPS Home Page

CAPS
History
Constitution
Executive
40th Anniversary
Meetings

Membership
Join CAPS
Directory

Newsletter
2010
2008 2009
2006 2007
2004 2005
2002 2003
2000 2001
1998 1999
1996 1997
1994 1995
1992 1993
Index
Advertising

CD
Tracklist
Booklet
Buy CD

Articles
Canada
Berliner
Victor
RCA
Columbia
Brunswick
Additions
Compo

Reference
Links
Journals

Go to CAPS Home Page

Antique Phonograph News
Canadian Antique Phonograph Society


Sep-Oct 2009

Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-Jun Jul-Aug Sep-Oct Nov-Dec
Unusual Machines
by Mark Caruana

[Editor’s note: The January 11, 2009, presentation to CAPS featured 'interesting and unusual machines' from the collections of our members. This article is the last of three intended to feature the machines presented at that time.]

Replica Parlor Tinfoil Phonograph

This exact replica Edison Parlor tinfoil phonograph was one of 25 commissioned by Ray Phillips, who has the original from which the parts were cast. This machine works remarkably well and I have successfully used it for demonstrations many times. The original version of the Parlor model was manufactured by Sigmund Bergmann in early 1879 and sold for a price of $15. In late 1879 the second version (this one) was manufactured by the Brehmer Brothers and sold for $10. Even with the price reduction, few Parlor Phonographs were sold and as a result they are extremely rare. The Brehmer Brothers version has a raised collar on the left side of the mandrel so that, if the tinfoil were removed, it could be repositioned on the mandrel to replay the recording later. In practice this never works very well.


Replica Parlor Tinfoil Phonograph
(Photo courtesy Betty Pratt)


Replica Hardy Tinfoil Phonograph

This exact replica Edme Hardy tinfoil phonograph was another machine commissioned by Ray Phillips, who has the original from which the parts were cast. This machine also works well and is a faithful replica. In February, 1878, Edison shipped this new model to his representative in France as a sample to be reproduced there. Parisian machinist Edme Hardy was contracted to manufacture this version and it is estimated that 500 of these were produced for sale at $40 US each. This machine is superior in design to the Parlor phonograph in that finer adjustments can be made to the depth of projection of the needle into the tinfoil and in the alignment of the tinfoil. Surprisingly, however, I have had better success demonstrating the Parlor phonograph.


Replica Hardy Tinfoil Phonograph
(Photo courtesy Betty Pratt)


Gillett Tinfoil Phonograph

Gillett tinfoil phonographs were never commercially produced, as all are built from a set of plans from a book titled The Phonograph and How to Construct It, by W. Gillett in 1892. For many years builders have used these plans to construct this well-designed machine. This version was built by Paul Gildea from Sandy Hook, Connecticut and I have found that it works as well as any of the tinfoils I have. Originally when I received it, the feed screw had a slight bend and I was very pleased with how Paul took it back and fixed it free. Over the years, a number of these machines have shown up on e-Bay and they tend to sell for a very reasonable price.


Gillett Tinfoil Phonograph
(Photo courtesy Betty Pratt)


Replica Berliner Hand-Driven Kammer & Reinhardt Gramophone

Yet another replica machine commissioned by Ray Phillips. This small machine is again a faithful reproduction of a rare piece from the dawn of sound reproduction. Having compared this to an original, I am satisfied that it plays and sounds as well as the original, which is not to say much. When Emile Berliner developed his design for the disc talking machine in the late 1880s, he contracted the firm of Kammer & Reinhardt in Germany to manufacture this toy which was distributed in Europe and Britain in the early 1890s. The 5-inch records manufactured for this machine are as exceedingly rare as the machine.


Replica of a Berliner hand-driven Kammer & Reinhardt gramophone
(Photo courtesy Betty Pratt)

Early American Record Piracy

[Editor’s note: This article is adapted from American Record Labels and Companies (1891–1943), by Allan Sutton & Kurt Nauck and republished from Mainspring Press with the express permission of Allan Sutton.]

Record piracy—so often in the news lately with the rise of illegal downloading—has a long tradition in the United States. Piracy of the easily duplicated wax cylinder was a common problem in the 1890s. The shellac disc record required considerably more expertise and equipment to pirate, but by the late 1890s the basic technology was well known.


Zon-o-Phone disc pirated from Berliner 0967, original recorded by the Metropolitan Orchestra, February 15, 1900. Note the scratches left in the master from buffing out Berliner’s original markings.
The First Disc Record Pirates

The earliest documented disc piracy on a commercial scale seems to have been carried out by the Universal Talking Machine Company, makers of the Zon-o-Phone machine. Universal’s marketing arm, the National Gramophone Company, had originally sold Berliner products. Through a complex chain of events well beyond the scope of this article, that supply source had been severed at the end of 1897. Lacking discs for its machines, Universal hired John C. English to set up a studio in mid-1899, but in the meantime it had begin to issue unbranded seven-inch discs whose resemblance to Berliner’s was not coincidental. The Universal engineers simply electroplated commercial Berliner pressings and buffed out all of Berliner’s markings, except the titles and catalog numbers. The practice seems to have ended in early 1900, by which time Universal was producing its own Zon-o-Phone masters successfully.

In 1902 Albert T. Armstrong introduced the American Vitaphone Record. Armstrong had been accused of record piracy as early as September 1899, in conjunction with his American Talking Machine Company, although it now appears that some of American’s red discs may have been original recordings. The Vitaphones, however, were clearly pirated from seven-inch Victor discs, in some cases still showing Victor’s markings in the inner band. Victor eventually sued Armstrong in October 1904 (Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Armstrong et al., 132 F. 11), introducing as evidence a Vitaphone disc pirated from Victor A-960. Judge Lacombe granted a preliminary injunction against Armstrong, but he died several months later.

The Continental Record Company

A later pirate, the Continental Record Company, placed its manufacturing operation offshore. Continental was one in a long line of shady ventures launched by Winant Van Zant Pearce Bradley, founder of two Toledo-based ventures (Ohio Talking Machine Co. and Talk-o-Phone Co.) that infringed the basic patents on lateral disc records and phonographs.


Continental disc pirated from a Fonotipia pressing. The mechanical-feed sticker placed on the reverse side was a standard Bradley ploy to skirt the Berliner patent on lateral recording.
(Courtesy of Kurt Nauck)
Bradley obtained commercial pressings of Victor and Fonotipia recordings by operatic celebrities and had them electroplated to produce stampers from which the original catalog numbers were effaced. The resulting masters were then shipped to an undisclosed foreign location for export back to the United States, where they were sold under the Continental label at approximately half the price of the records from which they were pirated.

Labels and sales literature made at least an attempt at disclosure, openly acknowledging that each disc was a "duplicate of an original record." Court records suggest that Bradley saw this disclaimer as a legal protection rather than an admission of guilt. Bradley also reverted to Leeds & Catlin’s unsuccessful dodge to avoid infringing Victor’s Berliner patent, claiming that the records were sold for use only on mechanical-feed machines.

Victor, Columbia, and Fonotipia Ltd. (Fonotipia’s London-based distributor) brought suit against Bradley in August 1909 (Fonotipia Limited et al. v. Bradley, 171 F. 951; Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Bradley, 171 F. 951). At the trial, Bradley was represented by Waldo G. Morse, the same attorney who had unsuccessfully defended Bradley’s Talk-O-Phone Company and its Leeds & Catlin affiliate against patent infringement charges. It was proven conclusively that Bradley had produced his discs by electroplating commercial pressings.

Despite Bradley’s claims that the pirated records were equal in quality to the originals, examination of the products at the trial revealed, in Judge Chatfield’s words, that the Continental pressings did not show "the use of as good material in the discs, nor as much durability and freedom from warping as those of the complainants, and a comparison shows in many instances a dulling or far away effect." Chatfield rejected Morse’s contention that Victor’s and Columbia’s licensing arrangements and price controls constituted restraint of trade. Ruling that Bradley’s operation amounted to unfair competition, he granted an injunction.

Investigation revealed that Continental had no office or plant, its only verifiable employee being an attorney in New Baltimore, New York. Bradley himself claimed to have no financial stake in the company, acting only as a sales agent, although he was unable to produce witnesses to that effect. The company’s billing address at 147 West 35th Street, New York, was discovered to be occupied by an unrelated storage company.


Two Victor pirates pressed in John Fletcher’s Olympic plant in early 1920. The Pan American specimen was plated from a commercial pressing and shows effaced Victor markings.
The John Fletcher Pirates

John Fletcher pressed at least two labels in his Olympic Disc Record Corporation plant during the early 1920s—Symphony Concert and Pan American—using pirated originals. Both brands show Fletcher’s characteristic catalog numbering systems, label typography, and sunken rings around the spindle hole, but stampers may have come from different sources.

Symphony Concert was Fletcher’s own brand, and material from his Olympic label was used on the ten-inch series. The twelve-inch series, however, was drawn from Victor Red Seal material by Enrico Caruso and other celebrities. The source of these pressings remains open to question. The stampers do not appear to be replatings, and may have been obtained from Deutsche Grammophon/Polyphonwerke in Germany, which licensed pre-World War I Victor material in its possession to Opera Disc and other labels in the early 1920s.

Pan American was clearly pressed from masters made by replating commercial pressings, sometimes none too neatly. Victor’s catalog and take numbers are still faintly visible in most pressings, along with light scratches, dust specks, and occasionally even strands of hair left on the commercial pressings prior to plating. The addition of a heavy, raised run-out groove is indicative of a European master source, but where and how these pressings were marketed remains a mystery.

"Nipper Building"
Rebirth and Centennial

by Keith Wright

On a recent family trip, APN editor Keith Wright visited the Camden site of Victor and took these pictures showing the revitalization of the Nipper Building, also known as RCA building 17 (while his family lined up for the Camden Aquarium). This building celebrated its centennial on July 12, 2009.